Final Course Reflection

(The following is a copy of my final course reflection which was required to be posted on my blog).

Although I generally dislike writing reflection assignments, I actually do enjoy non-compulsory informal reflection from time to time. I see the value in reflecting and at this particular moment in time, it is a good point to stop and reflect on my growth throughout this course. Luckily, this corresponds to a time when a formal written reflection is required. Reflecting on the suggested prompts definitely makes me appreciate what I have learned in this course.

What I found most surprising about how people learn is the fact that most people actually learn in very similar ways. During my teacher training, the concept of learning styles and differentiated instruction had been pushed on us by every one of our instructors, yet as it turns out, learning styles do not reflect how people actually learn (Costandi, 2013; Cuevas, 2014; Goldhill, 2016; Pashler, 2009; Pullman, 2017). In reality, matching a teaching style with a so-called learning style does not produce any improvements upon student learning or understanding (Glenn, 2009; Pashler, 2009).

As far as my personal learning process is concerned, this course has helped me recognize two aspects of my learning that I hadn’t fully appreciated in the past: my requirement for new knowledge to be based upon prior knowledge, and my requirement for relevance of the content in order to keep me motivated in my learning. I have always been a fan of the constructivist viewpoint, which states that new knowledge is filtered through the prior knowledge and experiences of the learner (Ertmer, 2013; Jenkins, 2006; Ormrod, 2009), but it wasn’t until this course that I thought about how my understanding of course content might be different from how others understand it. I also now recognize that basing learning on prior knowledge is a method of increasing motivation in learners (Keller, 1987; Keller 1999). The use of content and teaching methods that are relevant to the learner is another method for increasing motivation in learners that has a huge impact on me (Keller, 1987; Keller 1999). In the future, if I take a poorly designed course, I will do my best on my end to make the course relevant to myself, and to recognize when my prior knowledge and experiences are being used.

In studying the connection between learning theories, learning styles, educational technology, and motivation, I realized that it is not just about psychologists trying to understand how we learn, but rather about how to make us better learners. Although each learning theory is quite different, they provide information about how we learn, which can be translated into learning techniques (Ertmer, 2013). Although learning styles are not real, the learning preferences can help an instructional designer develop better teaching and learning strategies (Laureate education, n.d.). Although not all educational technology is useful, some is absolutely transformative and can bring about better learning apps (Borovoy, 2013; Burns, 2014a; Burns, 2014b; Dabbs, 2014; Davis, 2014; Davis, 2017; Miller, 2012; Richards, 2015; Robledo, 2012). The cherry on the top is motivation, which although it is internal to the learner, can be affected by the course design (Keller, n.d.; N.A., n.d.; Small, n.d.).

As a result of this course, I will be sure to use three things in my instructional design career. Firstly, I will base courses on the prior knowledge of the learners (Ertmer, 2013; Ormrod, 2009). Secondly, rather than relying on learning styles, I will use dual-coding theory to differentiate my instruction (Cuevas, 2014). Thirdly, to motivate my learners, I will use Keller’s ARCS model to ensure that all aspects of motivation are covered (Keller, 1987; Keller 1999).



Borovoy, A.E. (2013, August). 5-Minutes film festival: mobile learning. Retrieved from


Burns, M. (2014a, January). Android Apps: math, ELA, and video streaming. Retrieved from


Burns, M. (2014b, October). Using scannable technology to reach parents year round. Retrieved from


Costandi, M. (2013; April). The myth of learning styles. Retrieved from


Cuevas, J. (2014, October). Brain-based learning, myth versus reality: testing learning styles

and dual coding. Retrieved from

Dabbs, L. (2012, October). Mobile learning support for new teachers. Retrieved from


Davis, V. (2014, January). 20 Awesome BYOD and mobile learning apps. Retrieved from


Davis, V. (2017, June). The epic BYOD toolbox. Retrieved from


Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing

Critical Features from an Instructional Design Perspective, Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26, 43-71.


Glenn, D. (2009, December). Matching Teaching Style to Learning Style May Not Help

Students. Retrieved from


Goldhill, O. (2016, January). The concept of different ‘learning styles’ is one of the greatest

neuroscience myths. Retrieved from


Jenkins, J. (2006). Constructivism. In Encyclopedia of educational leadership and administration. Retrieved from the e-Reference from Sage database.


Keller, J.M. (1987). The systematic process of motivation design. Performance and instruction, 26(9), 1-8.


Keller, J.M. (1999). Using the ARCS motivational process in computer-based instruction and distance education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (78).


Keller, J.M. (n.d.).  ARCS model of motivational design (keller). Retrieved from


Laureate Education (Producer). (n.d.). Learning styles and strategies [Video file]. Retrieved from


Miller, A. (2012, October). Practical tips for mobile learning in the PBL classroom. Retrieved from


N.A. (n.d.). Instructional strategies for stimulating motivation. Retrieved from


Ormrod, J., Schunk, D., & Gredler, M. (2009). Learning theories and instruction (Laureate

custom edition). New York: Pearson.


Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2009). Learning Styles: concepts and

evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105-119.


Pullman, J. (2017, March). Brain scientists: ‘learning styles’ like auditory, visual, and

kinesthetic are bunk. Retrieved from


Richards. R. (2015, March). The qualitative formative assessment toolkit: document learning with mobile technology. Retrieved from


Robledo, S.J. (2012, October). Mobile learning: 6 apps and web tools for high school students. Retrieved from


Small, R.V. (n.d.). Motivation in instructional design. Retrieved from


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s